Do Babies Have Same Number of Alveoli as Adults
alveolar number at birth in human infants has been conservatively estimated to be at to the lowest degree half of the number of human being adults (forty, 49). In contrast, the number of conducting airways is completely developed past nascence in humans, but airway size increases with lung growth (3, 32). Comparison of lung morphology in macaques and humans shows that there are similarities in segmental organisation, structure and branching pattern of airways, arterial construction, and arterial changes after nativity (32, 41). Although there are differences in the number of lobes, the number of generations of dissimilar types of airways, and the number and size of alveoli, the overall structure in the monkey is more similar to that in man than is the construction of the lung of other laboratory animals (41). The full general developmental stages in the rhesus monkey are the following: embryo, 21–45 days gestation; fetus, 45–165 days gestation; newborn, 24 h postnatal; neonate, 0–one mo; infant, 1–12 mo; juvenile, 12–24 mo; adolescent, ii–4 yr; and young developed, 4–eight year (18). Stages of human lung development prove alveolarization by formation of secondary interalveolar septa from ∼36 wk of gestation to ∼1–2 yr of historic period and microvascular maturation by remodeling of interalveolar septa and restructuring of the capillary bed from nascency to 2–3 yr of age (5, twoscore). The majority of alveoli are produced postnatally in humans to accomplish the adult number of ∼450 million alveoli (35). One morphometric written report of lungs of children from 26 days to ∼5 yr of age identified two phases of postnatal lung evolution and growth: i) from nascency to ∼xviii mo of historic period characterized by alterations in volumetric proportions of parenchymal compartments, and ii) xviii mo to machismo with proportional growth of all lung compartments (49). In the beginning phase, in that location is a disproportionate increase in components that are concerned with gas exchange (air space and capillary volumes) with a proportional decrease in interstitial tissue mass.
Since many human infants are exposed to a multifariousness of inhaled infectious diseases and irritants such as air pollutants and ecology tobacco smoke that harm the lung, it is important that we sympathize the nature of these insults on the developmental process of the lung. This need necessitates the use of laboratory animals that correspond practiced models of human lung development in which we can written report normal lung development and its potential perturbation. Hence, we used precise, design-based stereological methods to sample whole rhesus monkey lungs to constitute the normal parameters of alveolar growth. The time of postnatal developmental stages of lung parenchyma in the rhesus monkey is about a 3rd that of the man. Thus we hypothesize that the almost rapid phase of alveolar development in rhesus monkeys volition be within the first year of life; yet, we included animals from 4 to 2,675 days (7 yr) because somatic growth is complete in rhesus macaques by six yr of age (7, 42).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals, Necropsy, and Tissue Collection
All monkeys selected for these studies were California National Primate Research Heart colony-born rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). All monkeys were given a comprehensive physical examination, including a breast radiograph and consummate blood count, and were adamant to exist salubrious monkeys. Care and housing of animals complied with the provisions of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resource and conformed to practices established by the Clan for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Intendance (AAALAC). Animal studies conformed to applicable provisions of the Brute Welfare Act and other federal statutes and regulations relating to animals (Guide for the Care and Employ of Laboratory Animals; National Institutes of Health, revised 1985). Experimental protocols were reviewed and canonical by the University of California, Davis Institutional Fauna Care and Use Commission. Xx-six rhesus monkeys (13 males ranging in age from iv to ane,920 days, body wt from 0.408 to 12.66 kg, and lung volumes from 41.7 to 602 cm3; xiii females ranging in age from 22 to 2,675 days, body wt from 0.472 to 3.nine kg, and lung volumes from 43.5 to 380 cm3; Table i) were killed with an overdose of pentobarbital after being sedated with Telazol (8 mg/kg im) and anesthetized with Diprivan (0.1–0.2 mg·kg−1·min−1 iv) with the dose adjusted as necessary by the attending veterinary. The monkeys were necropsied following exsanguination through the posterior vena cava. The lungs were stock-still via the airways through a tracheal cannula with i% glutaraldehyde-i% paraformaldehyde in cacodylate buffer (330 mosM, pH 7.iv) at xxx-cm fluid pressure (8 h). After fixation, the trachea was tied off at the fixation pressure level and held in the same fixative between 1–4 wk at room temperature. Subsequently, lungs were embedded in four% agar, isotropically oriented using an orientator (31), sliced into five-mm slabs, and sampled using a smooth fractionator (nineteen) for 10–12 v × v × fifteen-mm blocks for histology (26; Fig. 1 and Table ii). This sampling approach provides isotropic uniform random (IUR) sampling of lung tissue. Blocks were embedded in paraffin, cut in 5-μm serial sections, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin or Orcein stain for elastin.
Fig. 1.An illustration of an isotropic compatible random (IUR)- and smooth fractionator-sampled monkey lung. one) An agar-embedded lung is placed on a uniform clock and cut along a uniformly random direction in the agar, not in the tissue. Faces are labeled A–D to follow the orientation of the cut agar faces. ii) The agar block is then made to rest on the face but cut; the xc°-edge is now in the 0-0 direction of the nonuniformly divided (cosine-weighted) clock. three) Using a new random number, the cut is again fabricated in the agar. 4) The resulting block is re-embedded in the slicing machine with the last cutting confront (isotropic face) parallel to the cutting direction of the slicing machine. 5) and half dozen) Slabs are cutting at a abiding thickness of five mm and laid out on a table. vii) Each slab is then cut into bars of a width identical to the slab thickness at 5 mm. eight) The bars are sorted according to the area of the upper surface from largest to smallest. ix) Every second bar is pushed down out of the row, providing the smooth fractionator sampling sequence every bit illustrated by the arrows. Using a random start from one to 3 in the lesser row (two in this example), every third bar is sampled for a sampling fraction of i/3. 10) The bars are cut into 15-mm-long bricks. 11) The bricks are sorted co-ordinate to the area of the upper surface from largest to smallest. 12) Every second bar is pushed downwardly out of the row, providing the smooth fractionator sampling sequence as illustrated by the arrows. Using a random outset from ane to 3 in the lesser row (2 in this case), every 3rd bar is sampled for a sampling fraction of 1/3. 13) Each of the sampled bricks is put into embedding molds for embedding, sectioning, and staining.
| Sex activity | Age Range, days | BW Range, kg | 5L Range, cm3 | VL, cm3 | 5par, cm3 | Vnp, cm3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 22–2,675 | 0.47–3.9 | 43.v–380 | 183.6±123.24* | 176.9±118.16* | 6.7±5.61* |
| Male | 4–one,920 | 0.41–12.66 | 41.seven–602 | 197.7±176.62* | 190.8±172.04* | 7.0±v.59* |
| Sex | SF, bar | SF, cake | h (dis), mm | B Width, mm | SF, height | dx, dy | a (fra) | SF, surface area | SF | Fsgv |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female person | 0.ten* | 0.27* | 0.01* | viii.v* | 1.xi×10−3* | 1.67 | 0.04 | 0.01 | iii.99×10−7* | 0.51* |
| Male person | 0.06* | 0.31* | 0.01* | 9* | i.12×10−three* | 1.53 | 0.04 | 0.02 | iii.44×10−7* | 0.51* |
Morphometric Estimates of Lung Construction
Lung volume.
Lung volume (VL) without the trachea and extrapulmonary bronchi was estimated by its buoyant weight in PBS (36). The correct cranial lung lobes from three additional monkeys (seven mo, two yr 9 mo, and 5 yr 4 mo) were estimated by their buoyant weight in PBS and by the Cavalieri method, a book estimate of the sectioned (five-mm slabs) fixed lobe using point counting to estimate slab areas that were multiplied by the slab thickness to estimate volume (34).
Estimation of the Book of Parenchymal Components
Nosotros used the Intelligent Imaging Innovations software Slidebook 4.1 (Santa Monica, CA) at a magnification of ×185 to evaluate 10–12 sampled blocks per lung. Using stratified random sampling with a spacing of two,200 μm (∼65 fields per section) and a double lattice examination arrangement of 25/100 points, we evaluated the volume densities (Fivev) of parenchymal and nonparenchymal components using point counting. Points on alveolar air and interalveolar septa, alveolar duct core air, and other parenchymal compartments (terminal and respiratory bronchioles) were counted relative to FiveL. The absolute volumes of parenchyma (Vpar), alveoli (Valv), interalveolar septa (Vias), alveolar duct core air (Vad), and nonparenchyma (Vnp) were adamant by multiplying their V5 past VL in units of cm3.
Estimation of Alveolar Number
The method for counting alveoli is based on the mathematical concept of the Euler characteristics of structures (26, 35). This provides an estimate of the number of holes in a two-dimensional (2-D) net (alveolar opening rings). To gauge the number of alveolar opening rings, the number of bridges (B) and islands (I) that appear on one section of a "disector" pair but not the other are counted (see Fig. 5; Ref. 26). Bridges (the more frequent event) are connections that appear between two separate profiles in ane section but not the other. Islands (the rare upshot) are a new isolated profile. The Euler feature Δχ = (I-B/2). The total number of alveoli (North alv) in a lung (alv,lung) was calculated using the fractionator principle
where SF is the total sampling fraction, comprised of the sampling fractions of bars, blocks, heights, and areas (Tabular array 2). The acme sampling fraction was estimated equally the ratio of the disector peak (i.e., sections 1 and 3 for a disector height of 10 μm) to the block width on a microscope section (where the block width = block depth) (meet Fig. 7; Ref. 26). The area sampling fraction was estimated as the ratio of the sampling field area to the field displacement to the next sampled field in x-y at a magnification of ×420 using the Reckoner-Assisted Stereological Toolbox software organisation (Cast; Visiopharm, Horsholm, Denmark).
Estimation of Processing Shrinkage
An unbiased approximate of the global volume change is the following cistron for shrunken global volume (Fsgv), Fsgv = (∑SAlater/∑BAbefore)3/2, where the block area before processing, BAbefore, is estimated from the photographs, and section area after shrinkage, SAafter, is estimated by point counting; the summation is over all blocks for an animal (Table ii). All estimated accented surfaces and volumes on histological sections were corrected for global shrinkage by dividing with the above factor under the explicit assumption that shrinkage is uniform beyond all tissue components (12).
Estimation of Alveolar Surface
The surface of interalveolar septa/volume of lung (SouthwardvIAS,Lung) was estimated as Due southvIAS,Lung = ii × IIAS/LLung, where IIAS is the number of intersections with interalveolar septa past a linear probe, and LLung is the full probe length in sections of lung tissue (mm2/mmiii) or mm−1 (38). This equation is valid for test lines that are isotropic, uniform, and random in 3-D infinite (see Fig. ane; Ref. 46). The full surface of interalveolar septa within the lung (SIAS) was estimated equally SIAS = SvIAS,Lung × [1/(Fsgv)2/three] × VL, where (Fsgv)2/3 is the cistron for shrunken global volume raised to thetwo/3 power, and the units are converted to 10002.
Adding of Number-Weighted Hateful Alveolar Book
Number-weighted mean alveolar volume (V̄n alv) was calculated from previously described values as V̄n alv = VL × Vv alv,lung/N alv,lung, where the units are converted to μmthree (come across Fig. i; Ref. xx). In the number-weighted mean alveolar book, each air sac has an equal statistical "weight" regardless of its book.
Adding of Volume-Weighted Hateful Alveolar Volume
Book-weighted mean alveolar volume (V̄v alv) was calculated using the point-sampled intercept method that estimates the volume of structures provided that the tissue is sampled nether IUR conditions (meet Fig. 1; Ref. twenty). A CAST-Grid system was used to make the calculation equally V̄v alv = (π/3) × l̄ IAS 3 × (1/Fsgv), where l̄ IAS 3 is the mean of the cubed signal-sampled intercepts of alveoli, Fsgv is the factor for shrunken global volume, and the units are in μm3. In the volume-weighted mean alveolar book, each alveolus is "weighted" by its book. Consequently, when there is any distribution of alveolar sizes in a lung, the volume-weighted mean alveolar volume will always be greater than the number-weighted mean alveolar volume. Information technology becomes evident that the volume-weighted mean alveolar book has size information embedded in it that can exist estimated.
Calculation of the Coefficient of Variation of the Distribution of Number-Weighted Alveolar Volumes
The coefficient of variation of the distribution of number-weighted alveolar volumes (CVdue north alv) was calculated from previously described values (20) every bit
Variance and Efficiency of Stereological Estimators
The observed biological variation among individuals is large for features of interest in biological tissues, and it is useful to know whether information technology is worth increasing the precision of the stereological sampling or including more animals in the study (22). It is possible to split the observed variance (OCV) into its two components, the truthful biological variation (CV) and the average sampling variation of the stereological measurement (CE) in the following equation for the number of features, North: OCVii (N) = CV2 (N) + CEtwo (Due north).
For sensible fractionator sampling designs (nineteen), the dominating component of sampling variation is the counting racket. Because of the very thin sampling, the counting noise was calculated by the formula CEtwo racket (N) = 1/(∑B + ∑I), where the summation is over 1 brute (Table iii). Annotation that both bridges (B) and islands (I) contribute to the counting racket of alveolar number estimation. Contributions to stereological variation for ratio estimators like volume, number, surface, and length densities have been derived (9). Nonetheless, we used some simple guidelines that usually suffice for stereological sample size inside an animal (primary sampling unit of measurement): 100–200 probe interactions (e.m., point hits, intersections, or feature counts), 50 fields, and 10 blocks (25).
| Sex | ΣΔ̄χ | CE Dissonance | CV Biological | CV Full |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female person | −164 | 0.05 | 0.68 | 0.73 |
| Male | −172 | 0.05 | 0.72 | 0.77 |
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were based on linear and nonlinear regression (SAS Found, Cary, NC). A series of models were fitted to each result, considering age, FiveL, and weight equally predictors. V functions were considered for each outcome: linear, quadratic, ii-slice linear spline, a two-parameter exponential function, and a three-parameter exponential function. For instance, when considering an outcome equally a function of age, the models fitted to each outcome were
Linear: y = β0 + β1Age + e
Quadratic: y = β0 + βiHistoric period + βtwoAge2 + eastward
2-slice linear spline: y = β0 + β1Age + e if Age <= τ, and y = β0 + βiτ + β2(Historic period − τ) + east if Historic period > τ
Two-parameter exponential: y = β0exp(−βaneHistoric period) + e
Three-parameter exponential: y = β0 − (β0 − β1)exp(−β2Historic period) + e.
Assessment of model fit was based on the coefficient of determination (R2 ). The test for R2 is whether it is statistically different from 0. For the linear and two-parameter exponential functions, the minimum R2 value is 0.23. For the quadratic and iii-parameter exponential functions, the minimum R2 value is 0.21. The best fitting part for each outcome is reported. Age, VL, and body weight were centered to the sample means of 743 days, 190.7 cm3, and 2.92 kg, respectively. Sexual practice was treated every bit a moderator of model parameters to allow for sexual practice differences in all regression coefficients. Statistical significance was defined as P ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS
Ages in males ranged from 4 to one,920 days, whereas females ranged from 22 to 2,675 days (Table i). V50 in males ranged from 41.vii to 602 cmiii compared with females that ranged from 43.5 to 380 cm3 (Table i). Body weight in males ranged from 0.41 to 12.66 kg compared with females that ranged from 0.47 to 3.9 kg (Tabular array 1). Vpar comprised 96% of the unabridged lung in both sexes without the trachea and extrapulmonary bronchi. 5par showed a 3-parameter exponential part with historic period [adapted (Adj) R2 = 0.93] and Five50 (Adj R2 = 0.99) with males showing a significantly increased nonlinear change charge per unit compared with females (Tabular array 4; Fig. 2). Vpar showed a quadratic function with torso weight (Adj Rii = 0.92) with males showing a significant increased book at the mean value of 2.92 kg compared with females (Table 4). 5alv and Vad showed quadratic functions with historic period (alv, Adj R2 = 0.85; ad, Adj R2 = 0.91) and 5L (alv, Adj R2 = 0.97; ad, Adj R2 = 0.89) with males showing significantly increased linear or nonlinear modify rates compared with females (Table 4; Figs. 3 and iv). Fivealv showed a linear office with body weight (Adj R2 = 0.84) with males showing significantly increased linear change rate and an increased volume at the mean value of 2.92 kg compared with females (Table iv). Fivead showed a quadratic function with body weight (Adj R2 = 0.93) with males showing a significantly increased linear change rate and an increased volume at the mean value of 2.92 kg compared with females (Tabular array 4). Vias showed a three-parameter exponential function with age (Adj R2 = 0.75) and VL (Adj Rii = 0.82) but a quadratic function with trunk weight (Adj Rii = 0.79) (Table iv; Fig. 5). N alv,lung showed a quadratic office with age (Adj R2 = 0.74; Tabular array 4; Fig. half-dozen) and a two-parameter exponential function with VL (Adj R2 = 0.81) with males showing a significantly increased nonlinear change charge per unit compared with females (Table 4). N alv,lung besides showed a two-parameter exponential function with body weight (Adj R2 = 0.73) with females showing a significantly increased nonlinear change rate and an increased number at the hateful value of ii.92 kg compared with males (Table 4). The mean Euler characteristic for females (−164) and for males (−172) was sufficient to give an boilerplate sampling variation of the stereological measurement of 0.05 for both sexes, whereas the dominant variance in the study was biological (variability between animals; Table 3). SIAS showed quadratic functions with age (Adj R2 = 0.90) and VL (Adj R2 = 0.98) with no departure betwixt sexes (Table 4; Fig. 7). However, SIAS showed a linear role with torso weight (Adj R2 = 0.93) with females showing a significantly increased linear alter rate and an increased surface at the mean value of 2.92 kg compared with males (Table 4; Fig. 8). V̄n alv was best fit by quadratic functions with age (Adj Rtwo = 0.13) and torso weight (Adj R2 = 0.39), whereas with VFifty (Adj Rtwo = 0.32), a 3-parameter exponential function provided the best fit, indicating little consistency in modify with age or VL (Table iv; Fig. nine). Nevertheless, in females, V̄n alv and trunk weight showed a significantly increased nonlinear change rate and an increased alveolar volume at the mean value of 2.92 kg compared with males (Tabular array 4). It should exist noted that the mean values for V̄n alv, the number-weighted hateful alveolar volume, were 12% and for V̄5 alv, the book-weighted alveolar volume, were 29% greater in females than males (Table 5). Furthermore, CVn alv had 2-parameter exponential functions with age (Adj R2 = 0.48), VL (Adj Rtwo = 0.48), and body weight (Adj R2 = 0.42) (Table 4; Fig. 10), indicating a greater distribution of alveolar volumes with age, 550, and body weight. CVnorthward alv was also fourteen% greater in females than males, an indication of a greater distribution of alveolar volumes in females than males (Tabular array five). Furthermore, for females, CVn alv and trunk weight showed a significantly increased linear alter charge per unit and an increased alveolar volume distribution at the mean value of 2.92 kg compared with males (Table 4). As expected, the global shrinkage because of dehydration and paraffin embedding was very pronounced: the lung tissue shrank to 51% of the fixed volume of the monkey (Table 2).
Fig. two.The log of the volume of parenchyma volume (Fivepar) (cm3) vs. historic period (days) for females (solid line and filled circles) and males (dashed line and open up circles) is plotted co-ordinate to a three-parameter exponential function (Tabular array iv).
Fig. 3.The cumulative volume of alveoli (Fivealv) (cmthree) vs. historic period (days) for females (solid line and filled circles) and males (dashed line and open circles) is plotted according to a quadratic function (Table 4).
Fig. iv.The volume of alveolar duct core air (Vadvertising) (cm3) vs. age (days) for females (solid line and filled circles) and males (dashed line and open circles) is plotted according to a quadratic function (Table 4). Note that in that location is a meaning linear change rate between the sexes.
Fig. 5.The log of the volume of interalveolar septal tissue (Vias) (cmiii) vs. historic period (days) for females (solid line and filled circles) and males (dashed line and open up circles) is plotted according to a 3-parameter exponential function (Tabular array 4).
Fig. 6.The log of the number of alveoli in the lung (North alv,lung) vs. age (days) for females (solid line and filled circles) and males (dashed line and open circles) is plotted co-ordinate to a quadratic function (Table 4).
Fig. 7.The surface of interalveolar septa (SIAS) in the lung (mtwo) vs. historic period (days) for females (solid line and filled circles) and males (dashed line and open circles) is plotted co-ordinate to a quadratic function (Tabular array iv).
Fig. 8.The surface of interalveolar septa in the lung (mtwo) vs. body weight (kg) for females (solid line and filled circles) and males (dashed line and open up circles) is plotted according to a linear function (Tabular array four).
Fig. nine.The log of the hateful alveolar number-weighted volume (V̄n alv) (μm3) vs. age (days) for females (solid line and filled circles) and males (dashed line and open circles) is plotted according to a quadratic function (Table four).
Fig. 10.The coefficient of variation of the distribution of number-weighted alveolar volumes (CVn alv) vs. age (days) for females (solid line and filled circles) and males (dashed line and open circles) is plotted co-ordinate to a 2-parameter exponential office (Table 4).
| Variable | Predictor | Model | Sex | β0 | β1 | β2 | R 2 (Adj R 2) | Sex Divergence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vpar | Age | 3P Exp | F | 2.52 (0.0592) | ii.29 (0.047) | 0.00179 (four.62E−04) | 0.94 (0.93) | * |
| M | 2.72 (0.119) | 2.39 (0.0752) | 0.00148 (vi.94E−04) | |||||
| 5Fifty | 3P Exp | F | 2.63 (0.036) | ii.28 (0.0124) | 0.00703 (6.81E−04) | 0.99 (0.99) | † | |
| M | 2.76 (0.0442) | 2.29 (0.0176) | 0.00582 (seven.92E−04) | |||||
| BW | Quadratic | F | 2.43 (0.0366) | 0.168 (0.0485) | −0.0719 (0.0261) | 0.94 (0.92) | § | |
| M | 2.19 (0.0582) | 0.143 (0.0536) | −0.00964 (0.0263) | |||||
| Valv | Historic period | Quadratic | F | 112 (15.0) | 0.105 (0.0194) | −2.0 East−05 (i.7E−05) | 0.88 (0.85) | * |
| M | 119 (29.iii) | 0.129 (0.0302) | 3.3 E−05 (4.5E−05) | |||||
| VL | Quadratic | F | 118 (7.69) | 0.658 (0.0374) | −2.0E−05 (4.49E−04) | 0.98 (0.97) | ‡ | |
| M | 96.5 (10.4) | 0.491 (0.0655) | 5.55 E−04 (4.93E−04) | |||||
| BW | Linear | F | 169 (13.8) | 63.0 (9.83) | 0.86 (0.84) | ठ| ||
| M | 93.nine (17.5) | 24.viii (x.2) | ||||||
| Vadvertizement | Age | Quadratic | F | 57.3 (5.27) | 0.0484 (0.00682) | −2.0 E−05 (5.99E−06) | 0.93 (0.91) | ‡ |
| Thou | 57.eight (10.3) | 0.0635 (0.0106) | ane.5 E−05 (1.6E−05) | |||||
| VFifty | Quadratic | F | 54.8 (7.22) | 0.258 (0.0351) | −i.6 E−04 (iv.22E−04) | 0.91 (0.89) | † | |
| Chiliad | 68.2 (9.74) | 0.391 (0.0615) | −four.nine E−04 (4.63E−04) | |||||
| BW | Quadratic | F | 74.ii (4.50) | 35.6 (five.97) | iv.13 (3.21) | 0.94 (0.93) | ठ| |
| Thou | 54.2 (vii.xvi) | 16.1 (half-dozen.60) | −0.652 (iii.23) | |||||
| Fiveias | Age | 3P Exp | F | 1.xix (0.0853) | 1.05 (0.0676) | 0.00178 (0.00118) | 0.80 (0.75) | * |
| One thousand | 3.09 (7.25) | 1.11 (0.113) | 2.04E−04 (0.00141) | |||||
| VL | 3P Exp | F | ane.47 (0.623) | 1.02 (0.0570) | 0.00335 (0.00469) | 0.85 (0.82) | * | |
| M | ane.66 (0.655) | 1.12 (0.0812) | 0.00405 (0.00512) | |||||
| BW | Quadratic | F | ane.13 (0.0463) | 0.107 (0.0614) | −0.0320 (0.0330) | 0.83 (0.79) | * | |
| Yard | 1.05 (0.0736) | 0.110 (0.0678) | −0.00641 (0.0332) | |||||
| N alv,lung | Age | Quadratic | F | 8.24 (0.0640) | 4.35E−04 (8.3E−05) | −ane.06E−07 (7.26E−08) | 0.79 (0.74) | * |
| Grand | 8.33 (0.125) | 3.35E−04 (1.28E−04) | −two.96E−08 (1.90E−07) | |||||
| VL | 2P Exp | F | −8.23 (0.0362) | −3.1E−04 (3.7E−05) | 0.84(0.81) | † | ||
| Thousand | −8.25 (0.0513) | −1.6E−04 (4.4E−05) | ||||||
| BW | 2P Exp | F | −8.45 (0.0566) | −0.0322 (0.00494) | 0.76 (0.73) | †§ | ||
| M | −8.21 (0.0724) | −0.00649 (0.00509) | ||||||
| SIAS | Age | Quadratic | F | ix.79 (0.871) | 0.00746 (0.00113) | −2.5E−06 (9.89E−07) | 0.92 (0.90) | * |
| M | 11.0 (1.70) | 0.0101 (0.00175) | one.88E−06 (two.58E−06) | |||||
| VL | Quadratic | F | nine.63 (0.437) | 0.0415 (0.00213) | −3.0E−05 (2.6E−05) | 0.99 (0.98) | * | |
| M | 10.1 (0.590) | 0.0457 (0.00373) | −2E−06 (2.8E−05) | |||||
| BW | Linear | F | 12.vii (0.653) | iv.22 (0.466) | 0.94 (0.93) | ठ| ||
| One thousand | viii.80 (0.831) | ane.85 (0.482) | ||||||
| V̄n alv | Historic period | Quadratic | F | v.75 (0.0621) | 1.14 E−04(8.0E−05) | −viii.77E−08 (7.05E−08) | 0.31 (0.thirteen) | * |
| M | 5.77 (0.121) | two.14E−04 (1.25E−04) | −1.76E−07 (i.84E−07) | |||||
| VL | 3P Exp | F | 5.76 (0.0506) | five.76 (0.0500) | 0.0510 (0.0496) | 0.45 (0.32) | * | |
| K | 5.82 (0.0985) | v.74 (0.0754) | 0.0105 (0.0502) | |||||
| BW | Quadratic | F | v.79 (0.0491) | −0.118 (0.0651) | −0.0964 (0.0350) | 0.52 (0.39) | †‡ | |
| One thousand | five.74 (0.0780) | 0.0857 (0.0719) | −0.00911 (0.0352) | |||||
| CVn alv | Age | 2P Exp | F | −one.23 (0.122) | 3.6E−04 (viii.2E−05) | 0.54 (0.48) | * | |
| M | −1.23 (0.166) | ii.9E−04 (1.41E−04) | ||||||
| VL | 2P Exp | F | −i.31 (0.120) | −0.00287 (6.95E−04) | 0.54 (0.48) | * | ||
| M | −1.16 (0.167) | −0.00125 (8.21E−04) | ||||||
| BW | 2P Exp | F | −1.seventy (0.140) | −0.303 (0.0809) | 0.49 (0.42) | ‡§ | ||
| M | −1.12 (0.187) | −0.0502 (0.0831) |
| Sex | V̄n alv×10−5 | V̄v alv×ten−5 | CVn alv |
|---|---|---|---|
| F | 5.36±one.844 | 16.40±8.776 | one.37+0.629 |
| M | 4.79±1.605 | 12.67±7.433 | 1.20+0.474 |
Give-and-take
Vpar, Valv, Fivead, and Fiveias all increased rapidly during the get-go ii yr of life in rhesus monkeys and then slowly grew from two to seven yr. The rate of change was greater in males than females especially from 2 to vii yr in proportion to somatic growth. N alv likewise showed consistent growth throughout the vii yr, but increases in N alv were best predicted by increases in FiveL. Nonetheless, V̄north alv showed petty relationship with historic period, volume, or torso weight, and in females, V̄n alv was larger, and alveoli showed a greater size distribution of volume than in males. Alveoli increment in number but not volume throughout all of the postnatal developmental/growth stages (infant, 1–12 mo; juvenile, 12–24 mo; adolescent, two–4 yr; and young adult, 4–8 yr) in rhesus monkeys.
Oxygen Diffusion and Lung Parenchyma
Oxygen commutation between air and blood occurs by diffusion beyond the air-blood barrier in the lung parenchyma. Oxygen menses by diffusion from air to blood is governed by Fick'southward law that has a permeability coefficient, surface, and thickness of the barrier betwixt air and blood (16). A morphometric model of improvidence capacity that was proposed by Weibel (43) and later on refined past Weibel and colleagues (44) showed a direct correlation of diffusion chapters to alveolar surface and an indirect correlation to thickness of the blood air barrier. The morphometric estimate of diffusion chapters of oxygen in monkey lungs was very like to dogs and scaled linearly with body weight (17). Boosted studies using the morphometric estimate of improvidence capacity of oxygen in monkey lungs concur with these initial findings (i, 27). When Gehr and colleagues (17) compared the scaling of morphometric parameters (like alveolar surface area) with maximal oxygen consumption, they ended that bigger animals required a larger pulmonary diffusion capacity to admit the period of oxygen required past the organism. We would look the increase in surface surface area in monkeys during the first vii yr of life to show a proportional increment in pulmonary diffusion capacity even though there is no data on the maximal oxygen uptake in rhesus monkey lungs during postnatal development. It is noteworthy that membrane diffusion capacity and capillary blood book showed an age-related increment consistent with alveolarization from nascency to viii wk of age in lambs (ten).
Lung Growth Differences Betwixt Sexes
In humans, female lungs tend to be smaller than male lungs throughout babyhood and even in adolescence when girls achieve greater height earlier than boys. As girls accomplish their maximum adult height in late puberty, their lung growth ceases, whereas that of boys continues longer, in some cases into early adulthood (2). In boys and girls, the growth of the lung parenchyma and its airways occurs independently, merely this dysanapsis is more pronounced in boys (2). The configuration of the adult female person lung is the result of proportional growth of its airways in relation to its parenchyma, but that of the adult male lung is the result of dysanaptic growth where growth of the airways has lagged behind that of the lung parenchyma. Our measurements of parenchymal book in rhesus monkey lungs show very like trends over the first 7 yr of life that correspond to growth into early adulthood in humans. In rodents, females have smaller alveoli and more alveoli and alveolar surface expanse per torso weight than males (28, 29). Our observations in rhesus monkey lungs show similar results to those seen in rodents with more alveoli and alveolar surface area per torso weight in females compared with males. Withal, rhesus monkeys have larger alveoli per body weight in females compared with males, a result contrary that observed in rodents. Comparison of body weights in rhesus monkeys between sexes is complicated by the greater musculoskeletal growth and mass in males compared with females that occurs between 4–9 yr of age (37). Furthermore, in our data, VL was the best independent variable for the prediction of alveolar number and surface area in both sexes (Table iv).
Interpretation of Alveolar Number
Studies of Macaca fascicularis newborn (7 at 5 h), infant (2 at 14 days), and adult (vi mature females) lungs revealed that there was no increase in alveolar number during the first 14 days of life, and the alveolar number in developed lungs suggested that there was piffling alveolar multiplication after birth (24). Thus these results from the study of 1000. fascicularis are dissimilar than our study of Chiliad. mulatta equally well every bit the majority of investigations of man postnatal lung development (40, 49). Studies of homo lungs evidence a rapid alveolar growth phase from 36 wk of gestation to ∼ane–2 twelvemonth of age with germination of secondary interalveolar septa (40, 49). A phase of tardily alveolarization in the homo lung has been suggested (half-dozen). Although controversial in humans, early on studies proposed that alveoli increment in number until 20 yr of age (xiv, 15), whereas more than contempo studies proposed an age of viii–eleven twelvemonth (xi, 13) or even 2 yr of age (40, 49). Therefore, the verbal fourth dimension at which alveolar multiplication ceases in humans is all the same obscure. Differences between studies may lie in the stereological approach used to estimate alveolar number. Traditionally, the estimation of alveolar number has been done by assumption of a specific geometric shape, a rotatory ellipsoid (45). Human acinar reconstructions showed that geometric assumption-based estimates of alveolar number provided underestimates of true numbers (23). Their acinar reconstructions identified half dozen dissimilar geometric shapes for alveoli and thereby illustrate the difficulty in selecting one geometric shape as a mean of the representing all six shapes.
Recently, we (26) introduced an approach to alveolar counting that used the smooth fractionator (19), a rigorous design-based sampling approach to the lung and the Euler characteristic to guess the number of alveoli in lung without bias. Estimation of the total number of whatsoever feature in an organ or whatsoever containing space with the fractionator is straight, and there is no demand to know the reference book. This method is unaffected past global and differential shrinkage, swelling, and distortion of the containing space during embedding and sectioning. Euler number estimation uses physical disectors that are true book probes (39). Euler number estimation of alveoli makes no assumption regarding the size, shape, or orientation of the structures to be counted in contrast to two-D analyses. In essence, the Euler number count is directed toward counting the rings of alveolar mouth openings. Another approach that has been applied to rodent lungs estimates the number of alveoli in the lung indirectly by selecting private alveoli using series sections and a disector and then making book estimates by Cavalieri (33) or point-sample intercept (30) methods and dividing the mean alveolar volume into the volume of alveoli in the lung. This indirect approach is extraordinarily time consuming and is complicated by the need to define alveolar mouth openings in iii dimensions as a (curved) wall of the alveolar air space in serial sections. The alveolar counting procedure used in this paper is one of counting discontinuities of a well-defined structure, the alveolar wall. Except for the necessity of a well-trained observer who tin concentrate on the ends of the interalveolar septal walls, our experience is that the counting is straightforward and unproblematic (26).
Sampling
We previously optimized sampling for alveolar interpretation in adult rhesus monkeys (26). Ane refinement in this study was that we used a thinner slab thickness of 5 mm to increase our sampling in babe lungs just maintained a 5-μm section thickness. This allowed us to accomplish the appropriate sample total of 100–200 Euler counts per lung (Table three) (21). Although the sampling and processing steps were monitored and corrected for shrinkage necessary for estimates of mean alveolar volumes, the fractionator blueprint for the full number of alveoli is independent of shrinkage (26). Since only the counting noise is easily known in fractionator designs, it must exist kept low by a sensible design (xix). The estimated CE racket of 0.05 (Tabular array 3) for both males and females easily meets this requirement. The total observed CV of 0.77 and 0.73 in males and females, respectively, betoken that the remaining biological variability of alveolar number during postnatal development is very high. Of course, this is not surprising since nosotros are dealing with a developmental change of ∼11-fold in alveolar number in both males and females over the first 7 yr of life in rhesus monkeys. We can have confidence in our individual brute estimates considering of a value of 0.05 for CE noise.
Number of Alveoli
The general clarification of rhesus monkey body weights and lung volumes in this study are similar to previously published values for these species (vii). A precise morphometric written report of regional differences in rat lungs fixed by intratracheal instillation at 20 cmHiiO pressure showed significant decreases in the book and surface densities of interalveolar septa in subpleural compared with central lung regions (48). These investigators recommended that for quantitative light microscopic assay of lung tissue, the nigh appropriate sampling unit is at minimum the entire lobe (48). When monkey lung lobes are fixed by intratracheal instillation at 30 cmHiiO pressure, more than variation in alveolar number was observed between cranial and caudal lobes than between the unabridged left lung of adult monkeys (26). In this written report, we analyzed all 6 lobes of the rhesus monkey lung that were fixed by intratracheal instillation at 30 cmH2O pressure, a fixation pressure that mimics full lung capacity. Our utilize of smooth fractionator sampling followed past stratified random sampling of disectors on sections guaranteed an alveolar number that was contained of inflation fixation variation and variations in alveolar size. Our finding of the greater increase in lung volumes and alveolar area in males compared with females over all ages is very similar to that reported for postnatal human lung growth (40). The greater numbers of alveoli in males compared with females over all ages is also very similar to that reported for postnatal human lung growth (twoscore). At what age alveolar multiplication ends in humans is still open to question, primarily because of the stereological methods used and the variability between individuals. Our data in rhesus monkeys clearly documents alveolar addition in the beginning 7 year that has not been previously reported in nonhuman primates. However, the best predictor of alveolar number in a rhesus monkey lung is VFifty.
Alveolar Volume
Hateful alveolar volume showed a poor human relationship with historic period and FiveL, implying that with increases in 5L, alveoli are added and do not enlarge to whatever significant degree during postnatal growth in rhesus monkeys. It is noteworthy that females had mean alveolar volumes that were eight% greater than males. CVn alv, a mensurate of the size distribution of number-weighted alveolar volume, showed a steady increase with age for both males and females. Furthermore, CVn alv was 40% greater in females than males. It is possible from the greater size distribution that the greater hateful volume in females is the result of a subpopulation of larger alveoli in females that are not found in males. Because little is known about the development of lung parenchyma, virtually review manufactures on sex differences in lung evolution focus on the airways (4). Since this study is the commencement to mensurate CVdue north alv, more studies are needed to approximate the effect of increasing historic period in both sexes into adulthood (7–18 yr) and with sometime historic period (≥eighteen yr in rhesus monkeys). Does this greater CVn alv during postnatal evolution in females persist into adulthood and even advance with old age? If so, then mayhap there is an anatomical basis to the compelling evidence that women are more than susceptible than men to the development of chronic airflow limitation (viii). Furthermore, women who have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) seem to have a greater run a risk of hospitalization than men. The greater severity of affliction among women is consistent with evidence of a greater predisposition to develop COPD and the appearance of COPD at an earlier age than men (8).
The utilise of the fixed VL as estimated by the immersed buoyant weight in PBS may take overestimated our tissue and air space volumes. A comparison of right cranial lung lobe volumes from three monkeys spanning the range of this study showed an overestimation of 4.9–sixteen% by the buoyant weight method compared with the Cavalieri method. There was no apparent human relationship with age equally the pct of difference was least in the youngest (6.v%) and oldest (iv.9%) and greatest in the middle age range monkey (16%). A comparison of lung volumes by these two methods in domestic dog lungs showed that the volume of the intact fixed lung under positive pressure is systematically higher by 13–25% than that measured after sectioning and release of airway pressure level (47). Just lung volumes estimated by the Cavalieri method were used in the morphometric calculations of dog lungs (47). The lower shrinkage from immersion to the slab book estimate in monkey compared with dog lungs could be the result of a smaller size or fixative difference. Further studies are needed to investigate the shrinkage differences of these 2 fixatives (2.5% buffered glutaraldehyde and i% glutaraldehyde-1% paraformaldehyde in cacodylate buffer), but we strongly recommend that investigators study both volume estimators for time to come morphometric studies.
We have shown that alveoli are added in rhesus monkey lungs proportional to age, FiveFifty, and body weight into young adulthood in both males and females. Furthermore, we recommend that previous reports of postnatal development in nonhuman primates and humans be reconsidered considering of the potential bias of sample, tissue shrinkage, and geometric assumption of alveolar shape.
GRANTS
This work was supported by National Institute of Environmental Wellness Sciences Grants P01-ES00628 and P01-ES11617 and National Heart for Research Resource Grant RR-00169.
FOOTNOTES
The support of Primate Services at the California National Primate Research Centre for animal handling, care, and necropsy support and especially the efforts of Sona Santos were critical to this study and are gratefully acknowledged. Nosotros give thanks Kathy Westward for drawing Fig. ane. We give thanks Dr. Suzette Smiley-Jewell for editing the manuscript.
REFERENCES
- one Barbier A, Bachofen H. The lung of the marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): ultrastructure and morphometric data. Respir Physiol 120: 167–177, 2000.
Crossref | PubMed | Google Scholar - 2 Becklake MR, Kauffmann F. Gender differences in airway behaviour over the homo life span. Thorax 54: 1119–1138, 1999.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 3 Beech DJ, Sibbons PD, Howard CV, van Velzen D. Last bronchiolar duct ending number does not increment mail service-natally in normal infants. Early Hum Dev 59: 193–200, 2000.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 4 Boezen HM, Jansen DF, Postma DS. Sexual practice and gender differences in lung development and their clinical significance. Clin Chest Med 25: 237–245, 2004.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 5 Burri PH. Postnatal development and growth. In: The Lung Scientific Foundations , edited by Crystal RG, West JB, Barnes PJ, Weibel ER, and Cherniack NS. New York: Raven, 1991, p. 677–687.
Google Scholar - six Burri PH. Structural aspects of postnatal lung evolution–alveolar germination and growth. Biol Neonate 89: 313–322, 2006.
Crossref | PubMed | Google Scholar - 7 Campbell BC, Gerald MS. Trunk limerick, age and fertility amid costless-ranging female rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). J Med Primatol 33: seventy–77, 2004.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 8 Chapman KR. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: are women more susceptible than men? Clin Chest Med 25: 331–341, 2004.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 9 Cruz-Orive LM. All-time linear unbiased estimators for stereology. Biometrics 36: 595–605, 1980.
Crossref | ISI | Google Scholar - 10 Davey MG, Johns DP, Harding R. Postnatal development of respiratory office in lambs studied serially between birth and 8 weeks. Respir Physiol 113: 83–93, 1998.
Crossref | PubMed | Google Scholar - 11 Davies G, Reid L. Growth of the alveoli and pulmonary arteries in childhood. Thorax 25: 669–681, 1970.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 12 Dorph-Petersen KA, Nyengaard JR, Gundersen HJ. Tissue shrinkage and unbiased stereological estimation of particle number and size. J Microsc 204: 232–246, 2001.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - xiii Dunnill MS. Postnatal growth of the lung. Thorax 17: 329–333, 1962.
Crossref | Google Scholar - 14 Emery JL, Mithal A. The number of alveoli in the terminal respiratory unit of man during late intrauterine life and childhood. Arch Dis Child 35: 544–547, 1960.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 15 Emery JL, Wilcock PF. The post-natal development of the lung. Acta Anat (Basel) 65: 10–29, 1966.
Crossref | PubMed | Google Scholar - 16 Fick A. Ueber dice Messung des Blutquantums in den Herzventrikeln. Sitzungsbericht 16 Wurzburg: Physikalisch Medizinische Gesellschaft , 1870.
Google Scholar - 17 Gehr P, Mwangi DK, Ammann A, Maloiy GM, Taylor CR, Weibel ER. Pattern of the mammalian respiratory system. Five. Scaling morphometric pulmonary diffusing capacity to body mass: wild and domestic mammals. Respir Physiol 44: 61–86, 1981.
Crossref | PubMed | Google Scholar - 18 Golub MS, Gershwin ME. Standardized neonatal assessment in the rhesus monkey. In: Research in Perinatal Medicine , edited past Nathanson MW and Parer JT. Ithaca, NY: Perinatology Printing, 1984, p. 55–138.
Google Scholar - 19 Gundersen HJ. The smooth fractionator. J Microsc 207: 191–210, 2002.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 20 Gundersen HJ, Jensen EB. Stereological estimation of the volume-weighted hateful volume of arbitrary particles observed on random sections. J Microsc 138: 127–142, 1985.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 21 Gundersen HJ, Jensen EB, Kieu K, Nielsen J. The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology–reconsidered. J Microsc 193: 199–211, 1999.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 22 Gundersen HJ, Osterby R. Optimizing sampling efficiency of stereological studies in biology: or 'do more less well!'. J Microsc 121: 65–73, 1981.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 23 Hansen JE, Ampaya EP. Human air infinite shapes, sizes, areas, and volumes. J Appl Physiol 38: 990–995, 1975.
Link | ISI | Google Scholar - 24 Hislop A, Howard Due south, Fairweather DV. Morphometric studies on the structural development of the lung in Macaca fascicularis during fetal and postnatal life. J Anat 138: 95–112, 1984.
PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 25 Hyde DM, Harkema JR, Tyler NK, Plopper CG. Blueprint-based sampling and quantitation of the respiratory airways. Toxicol Pathol 34: 286–295, 2006.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 26 Hyde DM, Tyler NK, Putney LF, Singh P, Gundersen HJ. Total number and hateful size of alveoli in mammalian lung estimated using fractionator sampling and unbiased estimates of the Euler characteristic of alveolar openings. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Prison cell Evol Biol 277: 216–226, 2004.
Crossref | PubMed | Google Scholar - 27 Maina JN. Morphology and morphometry of the normal lung of the developed vervet monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops). Am J Anat 183: 258–267, 1988.
Crossref | PubMed | Google Scholar - 28 Massaro D, Massaro GD. Estrogen regulates pulmonary alveolar germination, loss, and regeneration in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Jail cell Mol Physiol 287: L1154–L1159, 2004.
Link | ISI | Google Scholar - 29 Massaro D, Massaro GD. Estrogen receptor regulation of pulmonary alveolar dimensions: alveolar sexual dimorphism in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Prison cell Mol Physiol 290: L866–L870, 2006.
Link | ISI | Google Scholar - 30 Massaro GD, Massaro D. Formation of pulmonary alveoli and gas-commutation surface expanse: quantitation and regulation. Annu Rev Physiol 58: 73–92, 1996.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 31 Mattfeldt T, Mall Thousand, Gharehbaghi H, Moller P. Estimation of surface surface area and length with the orientator. J Microsc 159: 301–317, 1990.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 32 McBride JT. Architecture of the tracheobronchial tree. In: Treatise on Pulmonary Toxicology: Comparative Biology of the Normal Lung , edited by Parent RA. Boco Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1991, p. 49–61.
Google Scholar - 33 Mercer RR, Russell ML, Crapo JD. Alveolar septal structure in unlike species. J Appl Physiol 77: 1060–1066, 1994.
Link | ISI | Google Scholar - 34 Michel RP, Cruz-Orive LM. Application of the Cavalieri principle and vertical sections method to lung: estimation of volume and pleural surface area. J Microsc 150: 117–136, 1988.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 35 Ochs Thousand, Nyengaard JR, Jung A, Knudsen 50, Voigt M, Wahlers T, Richter J, Gundersen HJ. The number of alveoli in the human being lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 169: 120–124, 2004.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 36 Scherle WF. A simple method of volumetry of organs in quantitative stereology. Mikroskopie 26: 57–60, 1970.
PubMed | Google Scholar - 37 Schwartz SM, Kemnitz JW. Age- and gender-related changes in trunk size, adiposity, and endocrine and metabolic parameters in free-ranging rhesus macaques. Am J Phys Anthropol 89: 109–121, 1992.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 38 Smith CS, Guttman L. Measurement of internal boundaries in three-dimensional structures by random sectioning. Trans Am Inst Metallic Engin 197: 81–87, 1953.
Google Scholar - 39 Sterio DC. The unbiased estimation of number and sizes of arbitrary particles using the disector. J Microsc 134: 127–136, 1984.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - forty Thurlbeck WM. Postnatal human lung growth. Thorax 37: 564–571, 1982.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 41 Tyler WS, Julian MD. Gross and subgross anatomy of lungs, pleura, connective tissue septa, distal airways, and structural units. In: Treatise on Pulmonary Toxicology: Comparative Biology of the Normal Lung , edited past Parent RA. Boco Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1991, p. 37–48.
Google Scholar - 42 Vanc̀ata V, Van c̀ atová MA, Chalyan VG, Meishvilli N. Longitudinal report of growth and body mass changes in ontogenesis in captive rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) from the Plant of Medical Primatology, Sochi. Variability and Development eight: 51–81, 2000.
Google Scholar - 43 Weibel ER. Morphometric estimation of pulmonary diffusion capacity. I. Model and method. Respir Physiol 11: 54–75, 1970.
Crossref | PubMed | Google Scholar - 44 Weibel ER, Federspiel WJ, Fryder-Doffey F, Hsia CC, Künig 1000, Stalder-Navarro V, Vock R. Morphometric model for pulmonary diffusing capacity. I. Membrane diffusing capacity. Respir Physiol 93: 125–149, 1993.
Crossref | PubMed | Google Scholar - 45 Weibel ER, Gomez DM. Architecture of the human lung. Utilise of quantitative methods establishes fundamental relations between size and number of lung structures. Science 137: 577–585, 1962.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 46 Weibel ER, Hsia CC, Ochs M. How much is at that place actually? Why stereology is essential in lung morphometry. J Appl Physiol 102: 459–467, 2007.
Link | ISI | Google Scholar - 47 Yan Ten, Polo Carbayo JJ, Weibel ER, Hsia CC. Variation of lung volume after fixation when measured by immersion or Cavalieri method. Am J Physiol Lung Jail cell Mol Physiol 284: L242–L245, 2003.
Link | ISI | Google Scholar - 48 Zeltner TB, Bertacchini Thousand, Messerli A, Burri PH. Morphometric estimation of regional differences in the rat lung. Exp Lung Res 16: 145–158, 1990.
Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar - 49 Zeltner TB, Caduff JH, Gehr P, Pfenninger J, Burri PH. The postnatal development and growth of the man lung. I. Morphometry. Respir Physiol 67: 247–267, 1987.
Crossref | PubMed | Google Scholar
Source: https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/ajplung.00467.2006
0 Response to "Do Babies Have Same Number of Alveoli as Adults"
Postar um comentário